Not all of us want this. Some of us want the government to quit stealing so much to return so little to the people who are actually paying for it.
I disagree with the term stealing, other than as it used to reflect the constant reduction in the progressiveness of our nations tax structure in favor of the rich. For example, go back and look at the corporate tax structure. Most folks will consider the 50s to be one of the times when America was strongest, economically dominate, the middle class strong, economy booming, and a family able to get by on a single adult income. Corporate tax rate at that time was over 50%. The reasoning is pretty straight forward, but I won't get into that here unless we'd like to do that. The point is, putting a larger and larger load on the shrinking middle class will not pay, sustainably, or in the short term for what we want and need as a nation. And yes, the government has to make decision for the nation as a whole, not individualized segments, no matter how vocal (unless they have a great lobby!). Personally, I say anonymize all campaign donations (give as much as you like, within reason to whoever you like, but have it come from a central processing center with no ability to track it back and make divulging such sourcing a criminal offense), force a balanced budget, go with the staggered 18 year term for each justice on the court (one swaps out every two years - making the court far more responsive to societal changes, less a geriatric fest, and each president gets to appoint two of them in each term). I don't have a problem with paying taxes, I have a problem with how much each person is selected to pay, and how it is spent. I should not pay more tax than Exxon (and I have).
A good short primer on tax rates (particularly corporate) and the economy in general is here, if anyone cares:
https://www.epi.org/publication/ib364-corporate-tax-rates-and-economic-growth/